The effect of two different types of cement restrictors on the femoral cement mantle.

نویسندگان

  • Adnan A Faraj
  • Kumariah Rajasekar
چکیده

Cement restriction and pressurisation are helpful technical points in achieving a good cement mantle in cemented hip replacement. In this prospective study, we compared 39 cases where a Hardinge polyethylene restrictor was used and 33 cases where a bone block restrictor was used during Charnley hip replacement. The preoperative radiographs were templated, calibrated holders for the cement restrictors were used intraoperatively, keeping the distal cement height within 2-3 cm from the tip of the femoral prosthesis. Postoperative radiographs were analysed. The Harris Hip scoring system was used for clinical assessment of results. The preoperative target of having a distal cement height of 2-3 cm was achieved in only 60.6% of the bone block group and 30.6% of the Hardinge group. The difference between the two groups is statistically significant (p = 0.001). Distal migration of the restrictors more than 3 cm from the tip of the femoral prosthesis was associated with a non-homogenous cement mantle in zones 3, 4 and 5 without affecting zones 1, 2, 6 and 7. The cement mantle was adequate when the distal cement mantle remained within 2-3 cm of the tip of the femoral prosthesis.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A comparison of distal canal restrictors in primary cemented femoral hip arthroplasty.

A retrospective study evaluated 75 total hip arthroplasties performed over a 4-year period using 4 different cement restrictors. A harvested bone restrictor, polyethylene restrictor (Smith & Nephew, Richards Inc, Memphis, Tenn), Biostop G (Depuy Orthopaedics, Warsaw, Ind), and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) (Wright Medical Technology, Arlington, Tex) were compared for the percentage of failures,...

متن کامل

Bone as a cement restrictor in elbow arthroplasty.

Elbow arthroplasty is performed less often than hip or knee arthroplasty. The most common reason for patients requiring elbow arthroplasty is chronic inflammatory joint disease, usually rheumatoid arthritis.1 Two main types of prostheses exist, linked and nonlinked. Prosthesis fixation in bone is achieved with bone cement in almost all linked and non-linked prostheses.2 Cement restrictors preve...

متن کامل

Osteolytic changes around biodegradable cement restrictors in hip surgery

Background and purpose - Biodegradable cement restrictors are widely used in hip arthroplasty. Like others, we observed osteolytic reactions associated with a specific cement restrictor (SynPlug; made of PolyActive) and reviewed our patients. Patients and methods - We identified 703 patients with suitable radiographs from our database (2007 to 2012) who underwent cemented hip arthroplasty and r...

متن کامل

Uncompromised quality of the cement mantle in Exeter femoral components implanted through a minimally-invasive direct anterior approach. A prospective, randomised cadaver study.

A complete cement mantle is important for the longevity of a total hip replacement. In the minimally-invasive direct anterior approach used at the Innsbruck University hospital, the femoral component has to be inserted into the femoral canal by an angulated movement. In a cadaver study, the quality and the extent of the cement mantle surrounding 13 Exeter femoral components implanted straight t...

متن کامل

Cement-within-cement revision hip arthroplasty.

We reviewed 19 revision hip arthroplasties in which the new femoral component had been recemented into the old, intact cement mantle. The mean time from the first operation to revision was 64 months and the average follow-up was 59 months. There were 7 excellent, 11 good, and one fair result. No femoral component had been revised for loosening and all the stems appeared radiographically stable....

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Acta orthopaedica Belgica

دوره 72 6  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006